by DRJ
Some of us have wondered about the disparity in the foul count between the Cavs and Celtics in their first two playoff games. Specifically Game 2, which the Celtics won even though they took only 18 FTs to Cleveland’s 38.
Turns out the Celtics fouled the Cavs on purpose, right from tipoff, usually when that was the only way to stop a sure score – and that accounted for much of the disparity in total fouls. There are 3 very good reasons for the Celtics to continue this strategy, and even ramp it up:
(1) The most obvious purpose is that it stops the Cavs from putting 2 points on the board. Since the Cavs are hitting their FTs at a rate somewhere south of 70%, it makes mathematical sense to foul (and even more so when the player being fouled is one of the bad shooters, a la Shaq).
(2) There is sound physical and psychological purpose in fouling rather than allowing easy scores. Momentum is killed. The Cavs’ budding excitement, if present, is nipped. Confidence is kept on edge. The crowd, if playing in Cleveland, doesn't get a chance to roar. If we foul them HARD... the Cavs will hesitate just a little the next time. And finally, the Celtics get some rest during the ensuing time out. All these benefits are added to #1 above.
(3) Fouling early can have a dramatically positive effect on the referees. To understand how dramatic, first you must appreciate how sensitive the Celtics are to certain referee misbehavior.
Some of us have wondered about the disparity in the foul count between the Cavs and Celtics in their first two playoff games. Specifically Game 2, which the Celtics won even though they took only 18 FTs to Cleveland’s 38.
Turns out the Celtics fouled the Cavs on purpose, right from tipoff, usually when that was the only way to stop a sure score – and that accounted for much of the disparity in total fouls. There are 3 very good reasons for the Celtics to continue this strategy, and even ramp it up:
(1) The most obvious purpose is that it stops the Cavs from putting 2 points on the board. Since the Cavs are hitting their FTs at a rate somewhere south of 70%, it makes mathematical sense to foul (and even more so when the player being fouled is one of the bad shooters, a la Shaq).
(2) There is sound physical and psychological purpose in fouling rather than allowing easy scores. Momentum is killed. The Cavs’ budding excitement, if present, is nipped. Confidence is kept on edge. The crowd, if playing in Cleveland, doesn't get a chance to roar. If we foul them HARD... the Cavs will hesitate just a little the next time. And finally, the Celtics get some rest during the ensuing time out. All these benefits are added to #1 above.
(3) Fouling early can have a dramatically positive effect on the referees. To understand how dramatic, first you must appreciate how sensitive the Celtics are to certain referee misbehavior.
Of ALL the teams in the NBA, the Celtics are MOST HARMED by the ticky-tack
fouls refs often start calling in the middle of games (for no
particular reason). We've all seen it... because it happens in most NBA
contests. Suddenly, and without warning, the refs will call some
ridiculous touch foul... then another one... and another... and soon –
especially if it's the Celtics they're hammering – the team is
completely off its game. Reason: the Celtics are the most
defense-centric team in the NBA. It's who they are. And defense is the
area most harmed by irrational referee calls, particularly those
nonsense ticky-tack foul calls we all hate. Players instinctively back
off, don't know what to do anymore, and confusion soon reigns.
In any given game, anything the Celtics can do to cut down on the refs calling ticky-tack fouls – is good. Now... when the Cs commit several obvious, intentional fouls... hard ones, preferably... early in the game — what happens when the time comes when the refs would normally start calling ticky-tacks? Well... they're all-too-human, as we well know... so they look around, and they see that the Cs are ALREADY loaded with fouls. They've been fouling conspicuously and hard at times, with no attempt at argument. It makes NO SENSE for the refs to start ALSO hitting them with ticky tack fouls. It would not only further unbalance the two teams' foul counts, it would feel ridiculous, because the pattern of foul-calling in the game has already been established – by the Celtics.
In a sense, by fouling early and hard (when necessary to stop scoring, of course), the Celtics effectively take some control of the refs. At least in terms of some of their foul calling. Now obviously, the effect will vary from one referee group to another. But however strong the effect is, it is a tremendously valuable and important accomplishment. One that is exceedingly hard to do! You can imagine how every team in the NBA would LOVE to be able to control the refs' foul calls... to ANY extent, however small. By doing what they did in Game 2, the Celtics are effectively achieving just that. It's a beautiful thing.
I don't know if they've thought all this through. Don't know if the team even REALIZES how valuable their early, intentional fouling really can be. I think they do... I think they planned it this way. But it doesn't matter – so long as they CONTINUE their fouling strategy while they can, while it still works. Because, remember... the Celtics are the one team in the NBA that is most sensitive to the BS referee calls we see in almost every game. Now they've found a way to control the BS. More power to them. God know, there's way too much BS in the world already.
In any given game, anything the Celtics can do to cut down on the refs calling ticky-tack fouls – is good. Now... when the Cs commit several obvious, intentional fouls... hard ones, preferably... early in the game — what happens when the time comes when the refs would normally start calling ticky-tacks? Well... they're all-too-human, as we well know... so they look around, and they see that the Cs are ALREADY loaded with fouls. They've been fouling conspicuously and hard at times, with no attempt at argument. It makes NO SENSE for the refs to start ALSO hitting them with ticky tack fouls. It would not only further unbalance the two teams' foul counts, it would feel ridiculous, because the pattern of foul-calling in the game has already been established – by the Celtics.
In a sense, by fouling early and hard (when necessary to stop scoring, of course), the Celtics effectively take some control of the refs. At least in terms of some of their foul calling. Now obviously, the effect will vary from one referee group to another. But however strong the effect is, it is a tremendously valuable and important accomplishment. One that is exceedingly hard to do! You can imagine how every team in the NBA would LOVE to be able to control the refs' foul calls... to ANY extent, however small. By doing what they did in Game 2, the Celtics are effectively achieving just that. It's a beautiful thing.
I don't know if they've thought all this through. Don't know if the team even REALIZES how valuable their early, intentional fouling really can be. I think they do... I think they planned it this way. But it doesn't matter – so long as they CONTINUE their fouling strategy while they can, while it still works. Because, remember... the Celtics are the one team in the NBA that is most sensitive to the BS referee calls we see in almost every game. Now they've found a way to control the BS. More power to them. God know, there's way too much BS in the world already.