◦ ARCHIVE INDEX — browse every page
Red's Army

Would you trade Isaiah Thomas and the 3rd pick for Jimmy Butler?

jimmy-butler-isaiah-thomas1

ESPN Insiders’ Chad Ford and Kevin Pelton look at the Celtics options with the #3 pick. First up, trade speculation:

Ford: I don’t think a deal with Philadelphia for Jahlil Okafor or Nerlens Noel is the answer. Kevin Love will be 28 years old before next season, so that’s not the right answer, in my view (assuming he’s even available).

DeMarcus Cousins is an intriguing option, although the Sacramento Kings haven’t been willing to move him yet and don’t appear to want more picks in place of established players. One deal that I would find intriguing for both sides? The No. 3 pick, Isaiah Thomas and Jonas Jerebko for Jimmy Butler.

Pelton: And I think the No. 3 and Thomas ($36.6 million net value on his bargain contract) for Butler ($48 million) is a bit much.

If I were Ainge, I might call the Denver Nuggets about their centers Nikola Jokic and Jusuf Nurkic. If Denver doesn’t believe they can play together, either would be an interesting prospect to add to the Celtics’ frontcourt. Nurkic for the No. 3 in a down draft probably would be reasonable value. Jokic would surely require additional return.

Are you as underwhelmed as I am?

First off, IT and the #3 pick is way too much for Jimmy Butler. I love Butler’s game but I’d veto that deal in a heartbeat. That last thing this team needs to do is trade away shooting.

I’m not that familiar with either of Denver’s promising young centers. Nikola Jokic is the better offensive player, Jusuf Nurkic is the better defensive player. The bottom line is … neither are going to speed up the rebuilding process. I’d lean for help on the defensive side.

I’m hoping Danny Ainge can come up with something better.

Like this Article? Share it!

  • RedsLoveChild

    Not sure Butler is worth Thomas OR the #3…let alone both!
    People need to stop putting Butler on a pedestal…he`s good, not great.

    If Butler were great, he {along with Gasol/Rose/Noah} would have at least found a way to make the playoffs in the weak EC.

    • Curt Hays

      Wow, do you see what you just said? Noah/Rose/Gasol couldn’t make the playoffs. 3 years ago, I’d have said you’re a fool if you predict that. THEN you have to consider that they had Jimmy Butler! Talk about underachieving.

      • RedsLoveChild

        Underachieved enough to get Thibs fired.

      • forever_green

        Holy, a Curt Hays sighting, where’s my camera.

      • Sean McLaughlin

        When has redslovechild ever been considered completely ON his rocker? Lol

    • zippittyay

      If they were in the *strong* Western Conference, they would have made the playoffs with their record.

      • forever_green

        If you think the east teams are better than the west, then you my friend don’t know basketball.

        • zippittyay

          I know wins are better than losses generally……

      • RedsLoveChild

        They never would have won 42 games if they were in the West.

        • zippittyay

          Why? Cuz they couldn’t play the Lakers enough times?

          • RedsLoveChild

            Bulls went 9-1 against BKLN, PHL, MILW

          • zippittyay

            So the rest of the teams they played in the East must have been pretty good, eh?

        • zippittyay

          So last year when 40 wins got you into the Eastern Conference playoffs the East was stronger? Make up your mind..

          • RedsLoveChild

            In head-to-head competition…WC teams won more games than EC teams this year.

            It was the 16th time in the last 17 years that has happened.

          • zippittyay

            so we had one team win 73 games and one team purposefully tanking. Other than that, if you won 42 games in the east, there were 8 teams better than you and you missed the playoffs. If you won 42 games in the west, there were only 5 teams with a better record than you. What happened in past years is no more relevant than than thinking the Celtics should win the title almost every year like back when the NBA was 8 teams.

          • zippittyay

            Last year, the Celtics got into the playoffs with 40 wins ‘because they played in the weaker conference’. This year, the Bulls *didn’t* make the playoffs with 42 wins because they played in the weaker conference. A little consistency in your arguments might tend to make them more convincing.

          • RedsLoveChild

            And both teams would`ve had even fewer wins if they were in the WC.

  • Astarot

    Too much and the main point is in the column above: it wouldn’t speed up rebuild especially considering that you’d give up your main “this year’s” asset in a 3rd pick. And trading this pick for either of Denver’s bigs is just plain stupid I’d take my chance on Bender cuz’ there’s always a chance in 2-3 years he could be really good. I guess it’s just that part of the year when you have to write or say anything just to keep your job.

  • Rick Rice

    No F’ing Way!

  • art

    It’s official. Chad Ford is an idiot.

  • jrleftfoot

    no